When a document is textually empty and ranks at 50, how does it affect its visibility in a review?

When a document is textually empty and ranks at 50, it may still be prioritized for review because the ranking indicates that there is some level of relevance or importance that has been assigned to it based on other criteria, despite the lack of text. In analytics and document review processes, documents that have ranks, even when they contain no text, might still be associated with metadata or context that makes them noteworthy.

For instance, the ranking might reflect the document's source, created date, or its relationship to other documents in a case. Therefore, rather than being outright excluded from review, it is possible that reviewers will decide to check this document to ensure no critical information is missed, which supports the idea of it being prioritized for review. This practice helps to maintain thoroughness in the document review process and ensures that no potentially significant document is overlooked simply because it lacks textual content.