When estimating Richness at the start of the project, should you skip documents or mark them as neutral?

In the context of estimating Richness at the start of a project, marking documents as neutral rather than skipping them ensures that every document is accounted for in the analysis. By marking documents you may not find immediately relevant or significant as neutral, you maintain a complete dataset that reflects the entire corpus of information available. This inclusion allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the data landscape.

Skipping documents could lead to missing key insights or losing context within the project, which might hinder accurate analysis later on. It’s also important to remember that, in some cases, what may seem irrelevant at first could become significant as project parameters evolve. Thus, ensuring that no documents are skipped helps provide a more robust basis for the project's findings and outputs.

By marking documents as neutral, you have the flexibility to re-evaluate their relevance later without losing any potential information, which is a central tenet of thorough data analytics practices. This approach enhances accuracy and supports more effective decision-making in the long run.