When working with a document set that has lower richness, which type of review should be chosen?

Choosing a prioritized review for a document set characterized by lower richness focuses the review process on identifying the most relevant documents first. In situations where the data lacks complexity or variety, a prioritized review allows for efficient processing by enabling reviewers to target key documents that are likely to have the most significant impact on the case or investigation.

This method optimizes resources and time, making it particularly beneficial when dealing with documents that may yield less informative content overall. Instead of reviewing every document in full detail, a prioritized approach enables teams to quickly assess and analyze those most pertinent to the objectives at hand.

Understanding the nature of the document set will guide the selection of the review type, as options like coverage, validation, and sample reviews might not effectively address the challenges presented by lower richness. These methods either involve ensuring completeness, verifying accuracy, or evaluating a subset without the focused prioritization necessary in this context. Thus, a prioritized review emerges as the most strategic choice in such scenarios.