Which option is not recommended for creating a coding panel for active learning?

Creating a coding panel for active learning involves ensuring that the process is efficient and that reviewers can easily access and manage the data relevant to their tasks. When considering the options provided, excluding family review is not recommended as it could hinder the collaborative aspect of the coding process.

Excluding family review may lead to a lack of oversight or additional context that is often necessary when coding data. Family review provides a mechanism for reviewers to consider related entries or context, which can enhance the accuracy and consistency of the coding. Not having this option available may isolate each entry, preventing reviewers from leveraging previously coded similar items which can lead to inconsistency and missed insights.

In contrast, enabling the Copy from Previous feature helps to streamline the coding process, making it easier for reviewers to apply consistent coding decisions across similar data points. Making the Reviewed Field required ensures that all entries are adequately assessed before finalization, promoting thoroughness in the review process. Turning off Family Propagation gives the reviewer more control over which fields are impacted by changes, ensuring that only the designated records are adjusted as necessary.

Each of these features supports a collaborative and thorough review process, while excluding family review detracts from it, making it the least recommended option in the context of creating an effective coding panel for active