Which review statistic is part of the Prioritized Review table but not the Coverage review table?

The highest ranked coded statistic is specific to the Prioritized Review table because it focuses on the categorization of documents based on their relevance to the case or issue at hand. This statistic highlights how the review process prioritizes certain documents for closer examination.

In the context of Relativity, Prioritized Review leverages insights from previous coding decisions or relevance assessments to streamline the review of potentially important documents, ensuring that the most relevant materials can be reviewed first. By concentrating on the highest-ranked coded items, reviewers can effectively manage their time and resources on documents that are likely to have the most substantial impact on the case.

The Coverage review table, on the other hand, typically emphasizes overall statistics related to the quantity and distribution of documents reviewed rather than their specific relevance rankings. The metrics under Coverage focus on providing a broader understanding of the volume of documents coded, the number of reviewers involved, and the overall success in capturing relevant documents rather than prioritizing individual document significance. This distinction makes the presence of the highest ranked coded statistic exclusive to the Prioritized Review table.